OpenID works!

I’ve always been intrigued by OpenID, while simultaneously being repulsed by the identifiers that I thought users were forced to adopt. Seeing one too many strings like:

tossed around made me think I’d have to adopt a username like that, which obviously is never going to wash, for aesthetic and typability reasons alone.

Fortunately Ned Batchelder’s rant, leading me to Simon ‘Zeppelin’ Willison’s demystifying blog post, taught me all about how to use your own URL as your OpenID equivalent of a username, by inserting some HTML onto your web page. So now I’ve managed to jump through the sign-up hoops required to get me one of those globally-unique OpenID username identifiers for myself:

There. That isn’t too painful, is it? Since I got set up, it has proven lovely to use. Get on board!

4 thoughts on “OpenID works!

  1. @michael: That’s funny, I already use mine several times a day. I guess you aren’t browsing the same giraffe-neck fetish sites that I am.

  2. Hey Nick,

    All you say has elements of truth in it. OpenID is certainly a pain to set up initially, as both Ned, yourself and I found.

    However, once in place I’ve found it convenient to use, no less so than signing up for new accounts at websites anyhow, especially if they ask for more info than just ‘username/desiredpassword/confirmpassword’

    Regarding the security, it’s certainly possible to use it in an insecure manner. This is generally the case with many aspects of security, not just OpenID-related stuff. It is possible to guard against the sort of problems you mention using a handful of mechanisms:

    1) make sure you choose an openID provider who offers browser side SSL certificates instead of just username/password logons.
    2) make sure you choose an openID provider who publishes a security certificate revocation list, and enable the use of such lists on your brower
    3) use the methods your openID provider gives to let you verify that they are really them, not a phishing attack instigated by polluted DNS, eg. mine displays an image that I chose and saved in a cookie. Nobody other sites have access to that cookie, so if I don’t see the image, then I know something’s up. Obviously I have to set this cookie on every computer I use.

    One of the strengths of openID is that I don’t have to choose one central provider and cross my fingers that them implement all of the above : there are many openID providers and one of the axes upon which they compete is in the security features they offer. Eventually, once we’ve figured all this out, presumably they will all provide things like this as standard, and will gradually figure out a way to make the initial setup more convenient. This is my hope, anyway. I don’t see any more viable solutions to this problem, so I’m happy to run with OpenID until anything better comes along.

    But basically I was afraid that if I signed up too late, then all the good usernames would be gone.

  3. Don’t the comments in the article you link to (Ned Batchelder’s rant) seem to indicate that this is both insecure and inconvenient?

    I don’t know exactly how it works (it bemused me when I once tried, for the same reasons it bemused Ned, although he persisted once I’d already given up) but one thing that jumps out is that it relies on DNS which isn’t exactly the most secure or unspoofable thing around.

    Me so unconwinced!

  4. Shame there’s only about three places you can use it…

    I’ve had one for ages (you’re late to the party) – but I still end up using it less than once a week…

    It works with though (and also sourceforge). :-)

Leave a Reply